Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kenneth Rivera v. William Byars, 13-6271 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-6271 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6271 KENNETH SYNCERE RIVERA, a/k/a Kenneth Rivera, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AGENCY DIRECTOR WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR.; SCDC NUTRITIONIST MARCIA FULLER; EVELYN BARBER, Head Kitchen Supervisor; WARDEN ROBERT STEVENSON, III, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (8:12-cv-02318-JMC) Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: J
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6271 KENNETH SYNCERE RIVERA, a/k/a Kenneth Rivera, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AGENCY DIRECTOR WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR.; SCDC NUTRITIONIST MARCIA FULLER; EVELYN BARBER, Head Kitchen Supervisor; WARDEN ROBERT STEVENSON, III, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (8:12-cv-02318-JMC) Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: June 5, 2013 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Syncere Rivera, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kenneth Syncere Rivera appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rivera v. Byars, No. 8:12-cv-02318-JMC (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2013). We deny Rivera’s motions to appoint counsel and for a transcript at government expense, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer