Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Karavias v. Angelone, 95-7106 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7106 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 23, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7106 JASON SOTIRIS KARAVIAS, II, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Director; ROBIN HULBERT, Ph.D.; WAYNE KINCAID; DAVE L. GRAHAM; RONDA YATES; PSYCHOLOGIST WILLIAMS; SAMUEL L. BATTS; JAMES E. SMITH; JAMES E. BRIGGS; E. C. MORRIS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-10) Submitted
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7106 JASON SOTIRIS KARAVIAS, II, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Director; ROBIN HULBERT, Ph.D.; WAYNE KINCAID; DAVE L. GRAHAM; RONDA YATES; PSYCHOLOGIST WILLIAMS; SAMUEL L. BATTS; JAMES E. SMITH; JAMES E. BRIGGS; E. C. MORRIS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-10) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jason Sotiris Karavias, II, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; John Britton Russell, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Karavias v. Angelone, No. CA-95-10 (E.D. Va. July 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer