Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bellamy v. Dalton, 95-2368 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2368 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 23, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2368 FAITH D. BELLAMY, formerly known as Faith D. Moore, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant - Appellee, and FRANK B. KELSO, II, Admiral, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-93-2446-WN) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, C
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2368 FAITH D. BELLAMY, formerly known as Faith D. Moore, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant - Appellee, and FRANK B. KELSO, II, Admiral, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-93-2446-WN) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Faith D. Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. Jane F. Barrett, Diane M. Lank, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and dismissing her employment discrimination action as moot. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bellamy v. Dalton, No. CA-93-2446-WN (D. Md. June 12, 1995). We deny Appel- lant's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer