Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Parker v. Virginia Beach Sher, 95-6855 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6855 Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 01, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-6855 MONROE ROOSEVELT PARKER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA BEACH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; FRANK DREW; D. C. COTTRELL; VIRGINIA BEACH JAIL, Medical Services; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, et al., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-537-N) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-6855 MONROE ROOSEVELT PARKER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA BEACH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; FRANK DREW; D. C. COTTRELL; VIRGINIA BEACH JAIL, Medical Services; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, et al., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-537-N) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Monroe Roosevelt Parker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Gary Alvin Bryant, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, Norfolk, Virginia; Jeff Wayne Rosen, ADLER, ROSEN & PETERS, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia; Gregory E. Lucyk, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint and imposing a prefiling review order limiting future litigation. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parker v. Virginia Beach Sheriff's Dep't, No. CA-94-537-N (E.D. Va. May 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer