Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Khaliq v. Jones, 95-7200 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7200 Visitors: 41
Filed: Feb. 01, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7200 JAME' ABDULLAH KHALIQ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PERCY JONES, Sergeant; FRANK MOSES, Correc- tional Officer; ANTHONY BROWN, Correctional Officer, Defendants - Appellees. No. 95-7201 JAME' ABDULLAH KHALIQ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GERALDINE MIRO, Warden; MARY MILLER, Lieuten- ant; D. K. WASHINGTON, Lieutenant; V. MOLE, Sergeant; JAMES BROOKER, Correctional Officer; COLVIN MANER, Correctional Officer; DWAYNE WAS
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7200 JAME' ABDULLAH KHALIQ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PERCY JONES, Sergeant; FRANK MOSES, Correc- tional Officer; ANTHONY BROWN, Correctional Officer, Defendants - Appellees. No. 95-7201 JAME' ABDULLAH KHALIQ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GERALDINE MIRO, Warden; MARY MILLER, Lieuten- ant; D. K. WASHINGTON, Lieutenant; V. MOLE, Sergeant; JAMES BROOKER, Correctional Officer; COLVIN MANER, Correctional Officer; DWAYNE WASHINGTON, Correctional Officer; E. JENKINS, Correctional Officer; TODD JONES, Correctional Officer; LIEUTENANT BEST; S. ALDRISH, Correc- tional Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-2857-2-17AJ, CA-95-96-2-17AJ) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jame' Abdullah Khaliq, Appellant Pro Se. John Gregg McMaster, Jr., TOMPKINS & MCMASTER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions accepting the magistrate judge's recommendations and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Khaliq v. Jones, No. CA-94-2857-2-17AJ; Khaliq v. Miro, No. CA-95-96-2-17AJ (D.S.C. June 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer