Filed: Feb. 01, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7381 J. RANDY DEER, a/k/a John Randy Deer, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PARKER EVATT, Commissioner, SCDC; P. DOUGLAS TAYLOR, L.C.I. Warden; LAURIE BESSINGER, K.C.I. Warden; J. D. WESSINGER, M.S.U. Deputy Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-94-597-3-18-BC) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: Februa
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7381 J. RANDY DEER, a/k/a John Randy Deer, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PARKER EVATT, Commissioner, SCDC; P. DOUGLAS TAYLOR, L.C.I. Warden; LAURIE BESSINGER, K.C.I. Warden; J. D. WESSINGER, M.S.U. Deputy Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-94-597-3-18-BC) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: Februar..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7381
J. RANDY DEER, a/k/a John Randy Deer,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PARKER EVATT, Commissioner, SCDC; P. DOUGLAS
TAYLOR, L.C.I. Warden; LAURIE BESSINGER,
K.C.I. Warden; J. D. WESSINGER, M.S.U. Deputy
Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-94-597-3-18-BC)
Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1, 1996
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
J. Randy Deer, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas McKay, Jr., Daniel Roy
Settana, Jr., MCKAY, MCKAY, HENRY & FOSTER, P.A., Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-
lief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate
judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Deer v. Evatt,
No. CA-94-597-3-18-BC (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 1995). See also Sandin v.
Connor, ___ U.S. ___,
63 U.S.L.W. 4601, 4605 (U.S. June 19, 1995)
(No. 93-1911) (actions that do not pose "atypical and significant
hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of
prison life" do not state a constitutional claim). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2