Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Coor v. Smith, 95-2733 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2733 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 31, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2733 BEAUTANOUS COOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus L. R. SMITH, Sergeant, Wayne County Sheriff's Department; JANICE H. FAULKNER, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Revenue; WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; RICHARD RIDDLE, Direc- tor, Controlled Substances Tax Division, N. C. Department of Revenue, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easte
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2733 BEAUTANOUS COOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus L. R. SMITH, Sergeant, Wayne County Sheriff's Department; JANICE H. FAULKNER, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Revenue; WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; RICHARD RIDDLE, Direc- tor, Controlled Substances Tax Division, N. C. Department of Revenue, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-290-5-D2) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Beautanous Coor, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Edward Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Alison Ailene Erca, BROUGH & ASSOCIATES, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief in his declaratory judgment action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Coor v. Smith, No. CA-95-290-5-D2 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 7, 1995 & Oct. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer