Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Butler v. Robinson, 95-2775 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2775 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 31, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2775 LILLABELLE ESTELLE BUTLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANDRE R. ROBINSON; JOHN CARROLL BYRNES, In the Circuit Court for Baltimore City; DELPHIA T. SIMPSON; CHASE & CHASE; GREGORY COUNTESS, Legal Aid; STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF SO- CIAL SERVICES; OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2775 LILLABELLE ESTELLE BUTLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANDRE R. ROBINSON; JOHN CARROLL BYRNES, In the Circuit Court for Baltimore City; DELPHIA T. SIMPSON; CHASE & CHASE; GREGORY COUNTESS, Legal Aid; STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF SO- CIAL SERVICES; OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-2586-HAR) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lillabelle Estelle Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Butler v. Robinson, No. CA-95-2586-HAR (D. Md. Sept. 8, 1995). We grant Appellant's motion to expedite this appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer