UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2620 GILBERT M. KOVER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. No. 95-2621 GERALD P. STARR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-94- 3001-MJG, CA-94-3002-MJG) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gilbert M. Kover, Gerald P. Starr, Appellants Pro Se. Glen David Nager, Robert H. Klonoff, JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE, Washington, D.C.; Steven Thomas Catlett, JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE, Columbus, Ohio; Brian K. Williams, Assistant General Counsel, WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's orders dismissing their complaints alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-34 (West 1985 & Supp. 1995). We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kover v. Westing- house Electric Corp., No. CA-94-3001-MJG; Starr v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., No. CA-94-3002-MJG (D. Md. Aug. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2