Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hunt v. Moore, 95-8563 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-8563 Visitors: 53
Filed: Feb. 29, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-8563 ROBERT LEE HUNT, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus MICHAEL W. MOORE, Director of SCDC; RICHIE HARRISON, Warden of MCI; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-95-1474-6-18AK) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 29, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WI
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-8563 ROBERT LEE HUNT, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus MICHAEL W. MOORE, Director of SCDC; RICHIE HARRISON, Warden of MCI; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-95-1474-6-18AK) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 29, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Hunt, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 (1988) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis- trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hunt v. Moore, No. CA-95-1474- 6-18AK (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 1995 & Dec. 4, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer