Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Benson v. Duvall, 95-2618 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2618 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 26, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Filed: February 26, 1996 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2618 (CA-95-716-A) Louella F. Benson, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus Kenneth Duvall, et al, Defendants - Appellees. O R D E R The Court amends its opinion filed February 21, 1996, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 4 - the decided date is corrected to read "February 21, 1996." For the Court - By Direction /s/ Bert M. Montague Clerk UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2
More
Filed: February 26, 1996 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2618 (CA-95-716-A) Louella F. Benson, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus Kenneth Duvall, et al, Defendants - Appellees. O R D E R The Court amends its opinion filed February 21, 1996, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 4 -- the decided date is corrected to read "February 21, 1996." For the Court - By Direction /s/ Bert M. Montague Clerk UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2618 LOUELLA F. BENSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH DUVALL; SALLY DUVALL; JASON DUVALL; JAMES G. SMALLEY; J. HOWE BROWN, JR.; JANE M. ROUSH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge; Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-716-A) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louella F. Benson, Appellant Pro Se. James Gerard Smalley, Fair- fax, Virginia; Rita Marie Sampson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Defendants' motions to dismiss and denying Appellant's motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Benson v. Duvall, No. CA-95-716-A (E.D. Va. July 18 & 28, 1995; Sept. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer