Filed: Mar. 29, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1964 EUSTACE NATHANIEL HALL, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration and Natural- ization Service. (A43-723-353) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eustace Nathaniel Hall, Petitioner Pro Se. William
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1964 EUSTACE NATHANIEL HALL, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration and Natural- ization Service. (A43-723-353) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eustace Nathaniel Hall, Petitioner Pro Se. William J..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-1964
EUSTACE NATHANIEL HALL,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration and Natural-
ization Service. (A43-723-353)
Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eustace Nathaniel Hall, Petitioner Pro Se. William Joseph Howard,
Karen Anne Herrling, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washing-
ton, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Eustace Hall petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal and ordering his deporta-
tion. Since filing the petition, Hall has left the country under a
legally executed order of deportation. The respondent, the Immi-
gration and Naturalization Service, has filed a motion to dismiss
the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Because this court lacks
jurisdiction to review an order of deportation once an alien has
been legally deported, we grant the motion to dismiss. 8 U.S.C.
ยง 1105a(c) (1988); Joehar v. INS,
957 F.2d 887, 889-90 (D.C. Cir.
1992).
DISMISSED
2