Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Klein, 95-7740 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7740 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 04, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7740 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TODD WALLACE KLEIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR-91-425-A, CA-95-654-AM) Submitted: February 29, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996 Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7740 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TODD WALLACE KLEIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR-91-425-A, CA-95-654-AM) Submitted: February 29, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996 Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Todd Wallace Klein, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard James Apperson, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Klein, Nos. CR-91-425-A; CA-95-654-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 1995). We find that Klein did not clearly waive his right to challenge his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the plea agree- ment. However, as the district court noted, the motion fails on the merits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer