UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6129 WILLIAM THOMAS BARNES; JAMES CARL RICHARDSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR; GARY T. DIXON, Defendants - Appellees, and DEBORAH ADLES, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-193-5-F) Submitted: June 28, 1996 Decided: July 18, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Thomas Barnes, James Carl Richardson, Appellants Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magis- trate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barnes v. Freeman, No. CA-94-193-5-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3