UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7909 DARRIN DEWAYNE BRUMMETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, and SCOTT WILKINSON; MICHAEL A. COSENTINO; RONNIE B. SHARPE; DON R. SMITH; DARRLY A. DIXON; LAMAR DESHAWN MULLINS; DANIEL ID-DEEN; LONNIE THOMPSON; MICHAEL PETERSON, a/k/a Larry G. Arrington, Plaintiffs, versus JAMES MCCAULEY, Defendant - Appellee. No. 95-8586 LAMAR DESHAWN MULLINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and DARRIN DEWAYNE BRUMMETT; SCOTT WILKINSON; MICHAEL A. COSENTINO; RONNIE B. SHARPE; DON R. SMITH; DARRLY A. DIXON; DANIEL ID-DEEN; LONNIE THOMPSON; MICHAEL PETERSON, a/k/a Larry G. Arrington,  Plaintiffs, 2  versus JAMES MCCAULEY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-3262-3-20BC) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darrin DeWayne Brummett, Lamar Deshawn Mullins, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 3 PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brummett v. McCauley, No. CA-95-3262-3-20BC (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 4