Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In Re: Massey v., 96-558 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-558 Visitors: 23
Filed: Aug. 07, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-558 IN RE: RICHARD L. MASSEY, JR., Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-94-1861-L) Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard L. Massey, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Richard L. Massey,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-558 IN RE: RICHARD L. MASSEY, JR., Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-94-1861-L) Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard L. Massey, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Richard L. Massey, Jr., petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus, complaining of delay by the district court in resolving his petition for habeas corpus. Massey admits that the district court has now acted on the petition. Although leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, the petition for mandamus is dismissed as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer