Filed: Aug. 12, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-549 In Re: WILLIE JAMES MURPHY, JR., a/k/a Jerry Robinson, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-91-277-2) Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 12, 1996 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie James Murphy, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-549 In Re: WILLIE JAMES MURPHY, JR., a/k/a Jerry Robinson, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-91-277-2) Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 12, 1996 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie James Murphy, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-549
In Re: WILLIE JAMES MURPHY, JR., a/k/a Jerry
Robinson,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-91-277-2)
Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 12, 1996
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie James Murphy, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Willie James Murphy filed this petition for a writ of mandamus
asking the court to compel the district court to grant his Motion
to Have the DEA/Government Reveal the Procedures Used in Testing
Substances Seized from Defendant and Supply Sample for Chemical
Analysis. However, mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. In re
United Steelworkers,
595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Murphy
could have challenged the district court's order by way of an ap-
peal. Therefore, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-
peris, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2