Filed: Aug. 21, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6647 LARRY OLIN WEBB, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA; MARTIN J. MCDADE, Superintendent, Harnett Correctional Institution, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Salisbury. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-95-361-4) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6647 LARRY OLIN WEBB, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA; MARTIN J. MCDADE, Superintendent, Harnett Correctional Institution, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Salisbury. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-95-361-4) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6647 LARRY OLIN WEBB, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA; MARTIN J. MCDADE, Superintendent, Harnett Correctional Institution, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Salisbury. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-95-361-4) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Olin Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis- trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a cer- tificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Webb v. Attorney Gen. of North Carolina, No. CA-95-361-4 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2