UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1966 BARBARA HOFFMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL HOFFMAN; JOSEPH ROUSE; STATE OF MARYLAND; JUDGE RICKS; JUDGE MULLINS; JUDGE DRYDEN; JUDGE GOUDY; JUDGE GREENE, JR.; JUDGE KELLER; ASSIGNMENT OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; KERRY ANDERSON; DAVID BOWERS; GALE ANN BELUCCI; RICHARD BACHARACH, M.D.; DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; GINGER HOWARD; INGRID HOFFMAN; SUE HOUSER; PAM ZIOLKOWKSI; BERNIE DIVVER; EASTERN DISTRICT POLICE DEPARTMENT OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 1969-AMD) Submitted: August 20, 1996 Decided: September 19, 1996 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barbara Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988), as amended by Prison Liti- gation Reform Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, her claim that her civil rights were violated during divorce proceed- ings. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reason- ing of the district court. Hoffman v. Hoffman, No. CA-96-1969-AMD (D. Md. July 2, 1996). Appellant's motion to supplement the record is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3