Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Craven, 96-6453 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6453 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 15, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6453 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES MILLARD CRAVEN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Rockingham. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-229-R, CA-95-69-4) Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: November 15, 1996 Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6453 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES MILLARD CRAVEN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Rockingham. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-229-R, CA-95-69-4) Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: November 15, 1996 Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Millard Craven, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Stanley Glaser, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (1994) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis- trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Craven, Nos. CR-91-229-R; CA-95- 69-4 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer