Filed: Dec. 31, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6369 CHANNING T. FURR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DIRECTOR, Virginia Department of Corrections; DALE A. GARDNER, Sheriff; DARNLEY HODGE, Supervisor, Clarke-Frederick-Winchester Adult Detention Center, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1098-R) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: Decembe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6369 CHANNING T. FURR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DIRECTOR, Virginia Department of Corrections; DALE A. GARDNER, Sheriff; DARNLEY HODGE, Supervisor, Clarke-Frederick-Winchester Adult Detention Center, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1098-R) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6369
CHANNING T. FURR,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
DIRECTOR, Virginia Department of Corrections;
DALE A. GARDNER, Sheriff; DARNLEY HODGE,
Supervisor, Clarke-Frederick-Winchester Adult
Detention Center,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District
Judge. (CA-94-1098-R)
Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
J. Lloyd Snook, III, SNOOK & HAUGHEY, P.C., Charlottesville,
Virginia; John Christian Lowe, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant.
Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIR-
GINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 (1994), amended
by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.
No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. Furr v. Director, No. CA-94-
1098-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
DISMISSED
2