Filed: Dec. 30, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1844 LINDA SYDNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-580-K) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linda S
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1844 LINDA SYDNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-580-K) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linda Sy..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1844
LINDA SYDNOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge.
(CA-95-580-K)
Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linda Sydnor, Appellant Pro Se. Valerie Valenti Cloutier, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order granting the
employer's motion for summary judgment in Appellant's action filed
pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§
12101-12117 (1994), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29
U.S.C. §§ 791-794 (1994), and MD. ANN. CODE art. 49B, §§ 7, 16
(1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Appellant failed to establish a
prima facie case of discrimination. Accordingly, we affirm. See
Ennis v. National Ass'n of Bus. & Educ. Radio,
53 F.3d 55, 58 (4th
Cir. 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2