Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Freeze v. Brown, Sec, 96-1693 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-1693 Visitors: 31
Filed: Dec. 30, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1693 CHARLES L. FREEZE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JESSE BROWN, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-554-4) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublishe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1693 CHARLES L. FREEZE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JESSE BROWN, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-554-4) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles L. Freeze, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. ยงยง 2000e to 2000e-17 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Freeze v. Brown, No. CA-94-554-4 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer