Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Ashe, 96-7608 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7608 Visitors: 45
Filed: Jan. 13, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7608 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHAWN WILLIAM ASHE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magis- trate Judge. (CR-92-191) Submitted: December 26, 1996 Decided: January 13, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per cu
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7608 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHAWN WILLIAM ASHE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magis- trate Judge. (CR-92-191) Submitted: December 26, 1996 Decided: January 13, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shawn William Ashe, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's order denying his motion for production of transcripts and other court documents at government expense. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dis- miss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge and be- cause the appeal is frivolous. United States v. Ashe, No. CR-92-191 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer