Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mayo v. Smith, 96-7289 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7289 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 13, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7289 ROBERT E. MAYO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SEWALL SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-823-JFM) Submitted: November 19, 1996 Decided: January 13, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished pe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7289 ROBERT E. MAYO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SEWALL SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-823-JFM) Submitted: November 19, 1996 Decided: January 13, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert E. Mayo, Appellant Pro Se. Gwynn X. Kinsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Mayo v. Smith, No. CA-96-823- JFM (D. Md. July 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer