Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Tatum v. Division of Corr, 96-7418 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7418 Visitors: 30
Filed: Jan. 24, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7418 LEAMON L. TATUM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DIVISION OF CORRECTION; MARYLAND HOUSE OF COR- RECTION; RICHARD LANHAM, DOC Comm.; WILLIAM L. SMITH, MHC-J Warden; MAJOR WILLIAMS; CAPTAIN KOPPEL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 96-1009-S) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 24, 1997 Before HA
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7418 LEAMON L. TATUM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DIVISION OF CORRECTION; MARYLAND HOUSE OF COR- RECTION; RICHARD LANHAM, DOC Comm.; WILLIAM L. SMITH, MHC-J Warden; MAJOR WILLIAMS; CAPTAIN KOPPEL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 96-1009-S) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 24, 1997 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leamon L. Tatum, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attor- ney General, Toni-Jean Lisa, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Leamon L. Tatum appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tatum v. Division of Correction , No. CA-96-1009-S (D. Md. Aug. 8, 1996). We deny Appellant's motions to appoint counsel and for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer