Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Edwards v. Dept of Air Force, 96-2706 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-2706 Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 06, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2706 MYRA R. EDWARDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, AFBCMR, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 95-3115-DKC) Submitted: January 14, 1997 Decided: February 6, 1997 Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2706 MYRA R. EDWARDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, AFBCMR, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 95-3115-DKC) Submitted: January 14, 1997 Decided: February 6, 1997 Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Myra R. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Kaye A. Allison, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her claim filed pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act* and her claims for damages and remanding her request for a correction to her late husband's military records to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records for further proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Edwards v. Department of the Air Force, AFBCMR, No. CA-95-3115-DKC (D. Md. Oct. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented int he materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * 5 U.S.C. ยง 552 (1994). 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer