Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hedgepeth v. Outlaw, 96-7522 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7522 Visitors: 40
Filed: Feb. 05, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7522 GARY WOOD HEDGEPETH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SCOTT W. OUTLAW; F. TIMBERLAKE; CITY OF AHOSKIE; DANNY POWERS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-96-629) Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 5, 1997 Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7522 GARY WOOD HEDGEPETH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SCOTT W. OUTLAW; F. TIMBERLAKE; CITY OF AHOSKIE; DANNY POWERS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-96-629) Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 5, 1997 Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Wood Hedgepeth, Appellant Pro Se. Larry S. Overton, OVERTON & CARTER, Ahoskie, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Gary Wood Hedgepeth, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the dis- trict court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Liti- gation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hedgepeth v. Outlaw, No. CA-96-629 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer