Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Yogaraj v. Washington Adventist, 96-2467 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-2467 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 21, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2467 VISALAKSHI YOGARAJ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WASHINGTON ADVENTIST HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-3217-AW) Submitted: February 4, 1997 Decided: February 21, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Visalakshi Yogaraj, Ap
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2467 VISALAKSHI YOGARAJ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WASHINGTON ADVENTIST HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-3217-AW) Submitted: February 4, 1997 Decided: February 21, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Visalakshi Yogaraj, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley James Reed, Susan Berry Bloomfield, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defen- dant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant's complaint filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (1994), and the Age Discrim- ination in Employment Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yogaraj v. Washington Adventist Hosp., No. CA-95- 3217-AM (D. Md. Sept. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer