Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Deaner v. Virginia Parole Bd, 96-7482 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7482 Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 27, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7482 MYRTLE ANN DEANER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-96-819-2) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Myr
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7482 MYRTLE ANN DEANER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-96-819-2) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Myrtle Ann Deaner, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion dismissing the action because it failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-124, § 805(a), 110 Stat. 1321 (1996) and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Deaner v. Virginia Parole Board, No. CA-96-819-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer