Filed: Feb. 26, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7131 JIMMIE NELSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TIM STRAWN, Officer; THE CITY OF MONCKS CORNER, Defendants - Appellees. No. 96-7632 JIMMIE NELSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TIM STRAWN, Officer; THE CITY OF MONCKS CORNER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-93-66-2-18AJ) Submitted: February 13, 1997
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7131 JIMMIE NELSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TIM STRAWN, Officer; THE CITY OF MONCKS CORNER, Defendants - Appellees. No. 96-7632 JIMMIE NELSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TIM STRAWN, Officer; THE CITY OF MONCKS CORNER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-93-66-2-18AJ) Submitted: February 13, 1997 ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7131
JIMMIE NELSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TIM STRAWN, Officer; THE CITY OF MONCKS CORNER,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 96-7632
JIMMIE NELSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TIM STRAWN, Officer; THE CITY OF MONCKS CORNER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-93-66-2-18AJ)
Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 26, 1997
Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
2
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmie Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY & SENN,
Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint (No. 96-7131), and
his Fed. R. App. P. 24 motion for leave to proceed in forma pau-
peris (No. 96-7632). We have reviewed the record and the district
court's order dismissing Appellant's § 1983 complaint on the jury's
verdict and find no reversible error. See United States v.
Saunders,
886 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, we deny
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss appeal No. 96-7131.
Further, in light of the disposition of appeal No. 96-7131, we deny
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss as moot appeal No.
96-7632. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
4