Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Nelson-Richards v. Board of Trustees, 96-2313 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-2313 Visitors: 23
Filed: Feb. 25, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2313 MELSOME NELSON-RICHARDS, Ph.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLEGE; ROBERT E. PARILLA, Dr., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-93-323-WN) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 25, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, S
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2313 MELSOME NELSON-RICHARDS, Ph.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLEGE; ROBERT E. PARILLA, Dr., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-93-323-WN) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 25, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melsome Nelson-Richards, Appellant Pro Se. Linda B. Thall, Senior Assistant County Attorney, Sharon Veronica Burrell, COUNTY ATTOR- NEY'S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland; Darrell Robert VanDeusen, KOLLMAN & SHEEHAN, Baltimore, Maryland; Joan I. Gordon, General Counsel, MONTGOMERY COLLEGE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Appellant's employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nelson-Richards v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Community College, No. CA-93-323-WN (D. Md. July 25 & Sept. 9, 1994; July 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer