Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Murphy v. Department of Army, 96-2796 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-2796 Visitors: 44
Filed: Feb. 25, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2796 YVONNE L. MURPHY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Commanding General INSCOM, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 96-1184-CCB) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 25, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublishe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2796 YVONNE L. MURPHY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Commanding General INSCOM, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 96-1184-CCB) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 25, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Yvonne L. Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, Unites States Attorney, Charles Joseph Peters, Sr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defen- dant's motion to dismiss in Appellant's employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Murphy v. Department of the Army, No. CA-96-1184-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 4, 1996). In addition, we have considered Appellant's allegations of error and find them to be without merit. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer