Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Foremanye v. Board of Community, 96-1589 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-1589 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 25, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1589 DEVERA L. FOREMANYE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BOARD OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRUSTEES FOR BALTI- MORE COUNTY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-143-H) Submitted: February 11, 1997 Decided: February 25, 1997 Before WIDENER and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1589 DEVERA L. FOREMANYE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BOARD OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRUSTEES FOR BALTI- MORE COUNTY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-143-H) Submitted: February 11, 1997 Decided: February 25, 1997 Before WIDENER and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. DeVera L. Foremanye, Appellant Pro Se. Carol Saffran-Brinks, BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment against her in this action alleging a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af- firm on the reasoning of the district court. Foremanye v. Board of Community College Trustees, No. CA-95-143-H (D. Md. Mar. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer