Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gent v. Smith, 97-1319 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-1319 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 08, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1319 JERRY L. GENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAT L. SMITH, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (MISC-97-1-A) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry L. Gent, Appellant Pr
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1319 JERRY L. GENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAT L. SMITH, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (MISC-97-1-A) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry L. Gent, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis yet imposing a partial filing fee. Appel- lant also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and recusal of the district court judge. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion imposing the partial filing fee and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reason- ing of the district court. Gent v. Smith, No. MISC-97-1-A (W.D. Va. Feb. 24, 1997). Additionally, we grant Appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Further, Gent has not shown extrajudi- cial, personal bias; therefore, we deny his motion requesting judi- cial recusal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer