UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1631 NANCY WRIGHT DORSEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RUTHERFORD COUNTY; RUTHERFORD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS; TONY HELTON; ROBERT LUCKADOO; DANNY DANIELS; FRANKLIN GOODE; ADEN LYNCH, in their capacity as Rutherford County Commis- sioners; DANIEL J. GOOD, in his capacity as Sheriff of Rutherford County; RUTHERFORD COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-96-94-4) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 20, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nancy Wright Dorsey, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Rainey, G. Michael Barnhill, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's adverse grant of sum- mary judgment in her civil suit alleging employment discrimination and intentional deprivations of her constitutional rights in viola- tion of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (1994), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dorsey v. Rutherford County, No. CA-96-94-4 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. AFFIRMED 2