Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dickerson v. Kingston Metals, 97-1566 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-1566 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 20, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1566 JESSIE W. DICKERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KINGSTON METALS SOUTH CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1722-3-17BD) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 20, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished pe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1566 JESSIE W. DICKERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KINGSTON METALS SOUTH CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1722-3-17BD) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 20, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jessie W. Dickerson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard James Morgan, Bernie Wellington Ellis, MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion for summary judgment in Appellant's employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dickerson v. Kingston Metals South Corp., No. CA-95-1722-3-17BD (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer