Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jones v. Brown, 96-6217 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6217 Visitors: 29
Filed: Aug. 19, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6217 FERMOND HINTON JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SANDY BROWN, Lieutenant; C. ZANDERS, Deputy; PETER ANDERSON, Doctor; LIEUTENANT WATERHOUSE; NORMA JEAN HARRIS, Lieutenant; CLAY HESTER, Sheriff; CHUCK MOORE, Major, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-94-500-2) Submitted: July 22, 1997 Decided: Au
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6217 FERMOND HINTON JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SANDY BROWN, Lieutenant; C. ZANDERS, Deputy; PETER ANDERSON, Doctor; LIEUTENANT WATERHOUSE; NORMA JEAN HARRIS, Lieutenant; CLAY HESTER, Sheriff; CHUCK MOORE, Major, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-94-500-2) Submitted: July 22, 1997 Decided: August 19, 1997 Before HALL, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fermond Hinton Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, SHUFORD, RUBIN & GIBNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Brown, No. CA-94-500-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 18, 1996). Appellant's motion to expedite is now moot and is dismissed for that reason. We dispense with oral argument and deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer