Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Transamerica Occiden v. Sanders, 96-2431 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-2431 Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 12, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2431 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California Corporation, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LAUNEIL SANDERS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-53-3-P) Submitted: July 29, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997 Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2431 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California Corporation, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LAUNEIL SANDERS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-53-3-P) Submitted: July 29, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997 Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Launeil Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Louis Adams Bledsoe, III, Stephen Graham Robinson, ROBINSON, BRADSHAW & HINSON, P.A., Char- lotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Launeil Sanders appeals the district court's order of judgment against him and in favor of Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Co. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. The district court acted in accor- dance with our decision in Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Co. v. Sanders, No. 96-1147 (4th Cir. July 8, 1996) (unpublished). Therefore, we deny Sanders's motion for sanctions and affirm the decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer