Filed: Sep. 16, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6277 TROY R. SUTTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; RICHARD W. FLEENOR, Postmaster, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-125-2) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6277 TROY R. SUTTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; RICHARD W. FLEENOR, Postmaster, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-125-2) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6277
TROY R. SUTTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; RICHARD W.
FLEENOR, Postmaster,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CA-97-125-2)
Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Troy R. Sutton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's
order denying relief on his Bivens* action under 28 U.S.C.A.
ยง 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. Sutton v. United States Postal Serv., No. CA-97-125-2 (E.D.
Va. Feb. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
*
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971).
2