Filed: Sep. 16, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6040 LEONARD FAULCON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENNIS R. BIDWELL, Warden; THOMAS WATSON, Officer; GARY MCKENZIE, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-96-879-WMN) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpubl
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6040 LEONARD FAULCON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENNIS R. BIDWELL, Warden; THOMAS WATSON, Officer; GARY MCKENZIE, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-96-879-WMN) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpubli..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6040
LEONARD FAULCON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DENNIS R. BIDWELL, Warden; THOMAS WATSON,
Officer; GARY MCKENZIE, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-96-879-WMN)
Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leonard Faulcon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Darrell Mack, Spe-
cial Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his Bivens complaint.* Our review of the record and the
district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without
merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Faulcon v. Bidwell, No. CA-96-879-WMN (D. Md. Nov. 25,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971).
2