Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Griffin v. Fleming, 97-6759 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-6759 Visitors: 37
Filed: Sep. 23, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6759 RICHARD GRIFFIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RUFUS FLEMING, former Warden of Nottoway Correctional Center, in his individual and official capacity; KEITH DAVIS, Assistant of Programs, in his individual and official capacity; RANDY MAYTON, Volunteer Services Director, in his individual and official capacity; CAPTAIN WHITLOW, Watch Commander, in his individual and official capacity; KIMBER- LEY H. RUNION, Former Operat
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6759 RICHARD GRIFFIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RUFUS FLEMING, former Warden of Nottoway Correctional Center, in his individual and official capacity; KEITH DAVIS, Assistant of Programs, in his individual and official capacity; RANDY MAYTON, Volunteer Services Director, in his individual and official capacity; CAPTAIN WHITLOW, Watch Commander, in his individual and official capacity; KIMBER- LEY H. RUNION, Former Operations Officer, in her individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-74-2) Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 23, 1997 Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Griffin v. Fleming, No. CA-96-74-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The order also granted Appellees' motion for a protective order, overruled Appellant's objections thereto, and denied Ap- pellant's motions for appointment of counsel and to amend the complaint. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer