Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Hale, 97-6906 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-6906 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 09, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6906 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DONALD EDWARD HALE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-36, CA-97-427-R) Submitted: October 10, 1997 Decided: January 9, 1998 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per cur
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6906 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DONALD EDWARD HALE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-36, CA-97-427-R) Submitted: October 10, 1997 Decided: January 9, 1998 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Edward Hale, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hale, Nos. CR-95-36; CA-97-427-R (W.D. Va. June 17, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer