Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Johnson v. United Steelworkers, 97-1998 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-1998 Visitors: 55
Filed: Jan. 09, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1998 ELIZABETH JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO CLC, Defendant - Appellee, and NORTON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-96-216-B) Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: January 9, 1998 Before HALL, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1998 ELIZABETH JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO CLC, Defendant - Appellee, and NORTON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-96-216-B) Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: January 9, 1998 Before HALL, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elizabeth Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Martin Kovalik, UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Scott Wayne Mullins, Coeburn, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defen- dant's motion for summary judgment and denying counsel's motion for leave to withdraw. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. United Steelworkers, No. CA-96-216-B (W.D. Va. June 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer