Filed: Jan. 09, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7159 CHRISTOPHER DOZIER, a/k/a Ashann Ra, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CORPORAL ADLDOOST; CORPORAL BALDWIN, Correc- tional Officer; G. CORPORAL BURGIN; CORPORAL J. SCOTT; R. TENETTE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-97-564-AM) Submitted: December 23, 1997 Decided: January 9, 1998 Before MURNAGH
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7159 CHRISTOPHER DOZIER, a/k/a Ashann Ra, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CORPORAL ADLDOOST; CORPORAL BALDWIN, Correc- tional Officer; G. CORPORAL BURGIN; CORPORAL J. SCOTT; R. TENETTE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-97-564-AM) Submitted: December 23, 1997 Decided: January 9, 1998 Before MURNAGHA..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7159 CHRISTOPHER DOZIER, a/k/a Ashann Ra, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CORPORAL ADLDOOST; CORPORAL BALDWIN, Correc- tional Officer; G. CORPORAL BURGIN; CORPORAL J. SCOTT; R. TENETTE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-97-564-AM) Submitted: December 23, 1997 Decided: January 9, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Dozier, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Dozier v. Adldoost, No. CA-97-564-AM (E.D. Va. July 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
