Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Martinez v. State of SC Justice, 97-7390 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-7390 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 07, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7390 GERARDO MARTINEZ; VINCENT T. MARTINEZ, Petitioners - Appellants, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA JUSTICE COMMITTEE; MICHAEL MOORE, Commissioner of South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLIE CONDON, At- torney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7390 GERARDO MARTINEZ; VINCENT T. MARTINEZ, Petitioners - Appellants, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA JUSTICE COMMITTEE; MICHAEL MOORE, Commissioner of South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLIE CONDON, At- torney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-3739-6) Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 7, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gerardo Martinez, Vincent T. Martinez, Appellants Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Caro- lina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellants seek to appeal the district court's order denying relief on their petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Martinez v. State of South Carolina Justice Comm., No. CA- 96-3739-6 (D.S.C. Sept. 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer