Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sowell v. Wheeler, Corr Off, 97-6840 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-6840 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jan. 13, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6840 SCOTT SOWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CORRECTIONAL OFFICER II WHEELER, Prison Guard, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-1604-JFM) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: January 13, 1998 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per c
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6840 SCOTT SOWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CORRECTIONAL OFFICER II WHEELER, Prison Guard, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-1604-JFM) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: January 13, 1998 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott Sowell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Scott Sowell appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court properly re- quired exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a) (West Supp. 1997). Because Sowell did not demonstrate to the district court that he had exhausted administrative remedies or that such remedies were not available, the court's dismissal of the action, without prejudice, was not an abuse of discretion. We therefore affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer