Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Vergara, 97-7355 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-7355 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 20, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7355 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JORGE HUMBERTO VERGARA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-94- 261-L) Submitted: December 16, 1997 Decided: January 20, 1998 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jorge Humberto Vergara, Appell
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7355 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JORGE HUMBERTO VERGARA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-94- 261-L) Submitted: December 16, 1997 Decided: January 20, 1998 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jorge Humberto Vergara, Appellant Pro Se. Jan Paul Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jorge Humberto Vergara appeals from a district court order denying his motion for immediate deportation. We affirm. Vergara motioned the district court for his immediate depor- tation under 8 U.S.C.A. § 1231(a)(4)(B) (West Supp. 1997). The district court found no private right of action to compel depor- tation proceedings under 8 U.S.C.A. § 1231. The district court was correct. That section authorizes the Attorney General to remove an alien prior to his term of incarceration if the Attorney General determines that removal is in the best interest of the United States. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1231(a)(4)(B). It does not provide incar- cerated aliens a private right of action to compel the Attorney General to deport them. See id. Finally, we conclude that the dis- trict court did not err in declining to construe Vergara's motion as one for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1997). Therefore, we affirm the district court order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer