Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McIntire v. Consolidation Coal, 97-1592 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-1592 Visitors: 25
Filed: Jan. 26, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1592 DONALD L. MCINTIRE, SR., Petitioner, versus CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (96-1143-BLA) Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,* Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam o
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1592 DONALD L. MCINTIRE, SR., Petitioner, versus CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (96-1143-BLA) Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,* Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. * Senior Judge Butzner did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). Donald L. McIntire, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se. William Steele Mattingly, JACKSON & KELLY, Morgantown, West Virginia; Patricia May Nece, Dorothy L. Page, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washing- ton, D.C. for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. McIntire v. Consolidation Coal Co., BRB No. 96-1143-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer