Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bolling v. Russell Cnty Dept, 97-2485 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-2485 Visitors: 26
Filed: Feb. 24, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2485 MARY ANNE BOLLING, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RUSSELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; ROGER DUFF; LAURAL RASNICK; LINDA PRICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-95-103-A) Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, S
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2485 MARY ANNE BOLLING, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RUSSELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; ROGER DUFF; LAURAL RASNICK; LINDA PRICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-95-103-A) Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary Anne Bolling, Appellant Pro Se. Kurt Joseph Pomrenke, ELLIOTT, LAWSON & POMRENKE, Bristol, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defen- dants' motion for summary judgment on her complaint filed under the ADA1 and Title VII.2 We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bolling v. Russell County Dep't of Soc. Servs., No. CA-95-103-A (W.D. Va. Oct. 17, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 1 Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 - 12213 (1994). 2 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e - 2000e-17 (1994). 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer